Legal Opinion
Rafferty v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 27, 1995No. 93-AA-871PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
In Rafferty v. District of Columbia Zoning Comm’n, 583 A.2d 169 (D.C.1990) (Rafferty I), this court remanded the instant ease to the Zoning Commission for consideration of several issues, chief of which was petitioners’ claim that the District of Columbia should be estopped from enforcing Planned Unit Devel*193opment (PUD) restrictions on the basis of which the District had issued a stop work order (rescinding an earlier construction permit) terminating construction of a two-story addition to petitioners’ townhouse.
Following a hearing, the Commission found that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Clay Properties, Inc. v. Washington Post Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Saah v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- George Washington University v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Rafferty v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Blagden Alley Ass'n v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Oakland Condominium v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011