Legal Opinion

Cline v. Milledgeville Banking Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 24, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Lewis.' Baldwin superior court. January 16, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.

1. The principles of law announced in those portions of the court’s instructions to the jury to which exception is taken are in accord with the law as enunciated in the eases of Johnson v. Leffler, 122 Ga. 670 (50 S. E. 488), and Rood V. Wright, 124 Ga. 849 (53 S. E. 390), on the subject of the wife’s liability on a note for money borrowed by the wife for the purpose of paying the husband’s creditors.

2. A charge embracing an abstractly correct and pertinent principle of law is not rendered erroneous by a failure to charge some other legal principle applicable to the case. Central Ry. Co. v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Leffler Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Rood v. WeightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. GradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Sheppard v. BroomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  3. McGee v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Burney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API