Burney v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for shooting at another; from Laurens superior court —Judge Kent. May 7, 1918.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. The 4th and 5th grounds of the motion for new trial will be considered together. The 4th ground alleges error in allowing the prosecutor to testify that the accused shot -at him “with a little 23 rifle,” when the indictment charges that the weapon used was a “shotgun.” The 5th ground complains that the trial judge expressed an opinion on the facts to the jury when *623the above-referred-to evidence was objected to, by saying, “Go ahead, a rifle is a shotgun.” Had these propositions been submitted to the writer a few months ago, he would have ruled that both objections were good, basing his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. BarringtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Hardin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. RandolphSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Trowbridge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brawner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Habersham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Norwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Bank of Graymont v. KingerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Joiner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.