Legal Opinion

Siebert v. Commissioner of Social Security

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 23, 2004No. 02-2158PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant James Siebert appeals cessation of his Supplemental Security Income benefits. Because we conclude that substantial evidence supported the decision of the administrative law judge, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

*745BACKGROUND

Mr. Siebert suffered head trauma while an infant, which resulted in his having a metal plate placed into his head and ultimately caused numerous physiological and psychological problems. Consequently, in 1992, Mr. Siebert filed for childhood Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. The Commissioner granted the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Clarence WALTERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Phyllis Elam, for Kamea Golay, a Minor v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Albert T. BRADFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF the DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. McCoy v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Abbott v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
  2. Anderson v. BerryhillDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
  3. Berger v. SaulDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
  4. Blythe v. BerryhillDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2019
  5. Buege v. SaulDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API