Siebert v. Commissioner of Social Security
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant James Siebert appeals cessation of his Supplemental Security Income benefits. Because we conclude that substantial evidence supported the decision of the administrative law judge, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
*745BACKGROUND
Mr. Siebert suffered head trauma while an infant, which resulted in his having a metal plate placed into his head and ultimately caused numerous physiological and psychological problems. Consequently, in 1992, Mr. Siebert filed for childhood Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. The Commissioner granted the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Clarence WALTERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Phyllis Elam, for Kamea Golay, a Minor v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Albert T. BRADFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF the DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- McCoy v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
3Cited by38 opinions
- Abbott v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
- Anderson v. BerryhillDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Berger v. SaulDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
- Blythe v. BerryhillDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Buege v. SaulDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.