Justin Hodges v. Amy Hodges
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1DissentHughes, J.
_JjI respectfully dissent from the majority opinion, holding that LSA-R.S. 9:335 does not allow a district court to designate both parents in a child custody matter as “co-domiciliary parents.”
The trial judge in the instant case was presented with testimony demonstrating that prior to trial the parents had been sharing equal physical custody of their minor child, M.H., and the parents had been making all decisions regarding the- child jointly. No testimony was- presented to indicate that any disagreements had occurred between the parents on these issues. The mother nevertheless sought to be…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Copenhaver v. John Bonura & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Ferry v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Associated Motors, Inc. v. BurkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Mathes v. SchwingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.