Vermillion v. Marvel Merchandising Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Clay, Commissioner
Reversing.
The controversy in this case arises on appellants’ counter-claim for a breach of contract. On a trial of the *197case, the jury returned a verdict for the appellee company. Appellants contend they were entitled to a directed verdict, and the instructions were erroneous.
On January 23, 1947, appellants ordered through appellee’s salesman twenty-five washing machines at the list price of $115.50. The shipping date on the order was noted “as ready.” A memorandum on the order specified: “If possible ship two with or without motors at once. Balance to follow as arrival of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville R. v. CoyleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Monarch Portland Cement Co. v. P. J. Creedon & SonsNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- Twenty-Four Collection, Inc. v. M. Weinbaum Construction, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Pacific Coast Engineering Company, a Corporation v. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969