Legal Opinion

"W" Sheep Co. v. Pine Dome Oil Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1924No. 1140PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PotteR, Chief Justice.

This cause is here on error, and has been heard upon a motion to dismiss and also upon the merits subject to the disposition of that motion. The defendants in error, however, have not appeared except by their motion to dismiss, and might, no doubt, under our decisions, be entitled still to file and serve briefs upon the merits if their motion to dismiss should be denied. But the motion must be sustained.

It will be necessary to consider only one of the several grounds assigned in the motion, viz: That the proceeding in error was not commenced within one year after the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grover Irrigation & Land Co. v. Lovella Ditch, Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Seibel v. BathWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Conradt v. LepperWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Perkins v. McDowellWyoming Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Bank of Chadron v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rowray v. McCarthyWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Posvar v. Royce, SheriffWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. BuchananWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Spalding v. McKnightWyoming Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Lawer Auto Supply v. Teton Auto Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API