Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Almira Farmers Warehouse Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1924No. 18484PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

A statement of the facts in this case is found in 123 Wash. 354, 212 Pac. 543, wherein a judgment was entered reversing the lower court and granting a new trial. From a judgment in favor of respondent upon the second trial, this appeal is taken. It is not necessary to restate the facts except wherein they are materially different from the facts found in the former opinion.

It is the contention of appellant that, “in order to be entitled to a lien on this wheat, the expenditures for which a lien was claimed must have been made for the benefit of the wheat while it was stored with respondent, or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Broadwater Farms Co. v. Broadwater Elevator Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State Bank v. Almira Farmers Warehouse Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. San Angelo Wine & Spirits Corp. v. South End Warehouse Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1936
  2. Harbor View Marine Corp. v. Braudy. In Re Pearl Fisheries, IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
  3. Harbor View Marine Corp. v. Braudy. In Re Pearl Fisheries, IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API