Legal Opinion
Bridge v. OCWEN FEDERAL BANK
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 28, 2009No. Case 1:07 CV 2739PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DOWD, District Judge.
In their nine count Second Amended Complaint (ECF 80), plaintiffs claim that the defendants violated several federal statutes, as well as Ohio statutory and common law duties, regarding debt collection and credit reporting, following an incident in April 2002 where plaintiff Lisa Bridge was incorrectly credited with making only one home mortgage payment when she had actually made two payments. ECF 80.
Presently before the Court are two motions to dismiss certain counts of plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gunasekera v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Duane Montgomery v. Huntington Bank and Silver Shadow Recovery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Girgis v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Brown v. Hosto & Buchan, PLLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
- CitiMortgage, Inc. v. RudzikOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. HorvathDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Miller v. I.C. System, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021