Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Henshaw

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 1921No. 9890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by Wiillie Henshaw, a minor, by Pleas Henshaw, her legal guardian, against A. O. Johnson and another. Judgment for •plaintiff was affirmed (80 Okla. 58, 193 Pac. 998), and plaintiff, moves for judgment against sureties on supersedeas bond.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.

On December 14, 1920, an opinion was rendered by this court in the above case in favor of the defendant in error (80 Okla. 58, 193 Pac. 998), bu tit did not expressly give judgment against sureties on supersedeas bond. Motion is now made by defendant in error for judgment against such sureties. Under chapter 249, Session Laws 1915, p. 606, as construed by this court in Long v. O. R. Lang & Co., 49 Okla. 342, 152 Pac. 1078, Wilcox v. Wooten, 60 Okla. 204, 159 Pac. 1118, and Rumley v. Sanders et al., 62 Okla. 284, 162 Pac. 949, judgment should have been rendered against the sureties on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Long v. O. R. Lang & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Johnson v. HenshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Wilcox v. WoottonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Eureka Pub. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of StiglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. McShanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API