Legal Opinion

Eureka Pub. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Stigler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 12, 1916No. 7608PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Haskell County; vY. H. Brown, .Tudge. Action between the First National Bank of Stigler, a corporation, and the Eureka Publishing Company. There was a judgment for the former and the latter brings error. The judgment being affirmed, the successful party moved for judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas Ijond.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

EDWARDS, C.

On appeal to this court the judgment rendered in the lower court was affirmed. A supersedeas bond had been given staying the execution. A motion has been filed herein for judgment against the sureties on such supersedeas bond. By virtue of the provisions of chapter 249, Sess. Laws 1915, as construed in Long v. Lang, 49 Okla. 342, 152 Pac. 1078. the motion is sustained.

Judgment is therefore entered in this court in favor of the First National Bank of Stigler in the sum of 81,172.55, with 10 per cent, interest from January 8,1915, for 822.25 costs taxed in the lower court,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Long v. O. R. Lang & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. HenshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API