Doyle v. State

HOLCOMB, Justice.

This appeal arises from a jury verdict of guilty, assessing punishment at twenty-five years, for the aggravated assault of a prison official. We will affirm.

Appellant brings three points of error. First, he argues that the State should not have been allowed to bring a witness to rebut unforeseen testimony by Appellant himself, because the witness had not been disclosed as required by the court’s discovery order. Second, he argues that two officers should not have been allowed to give testimony as to their opinion of whether Appellant’s acts were intentional or accidental…