Legal Opinion
Klestadt & Winters, LLP v. Cangelosi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 6, 2012No. 10-16970, 10-16972, 10-16974PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge IKUTA; Concurrence by Judge QUIST; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge GRABER.
OPINION
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
Silar Advisors, LP, Robert Leeds, Jay Gracin, and Sara Pfrommer (collectively “the Silar Parties”), and Tracy Klestadt and Klestadt & Winters, LLP, Katherine M. Windier, and Bryan Cave, LLP (collectively “Counsel”), appeal the district court’s order imposing sanctions on them pursuant to Rule 9011 of the Federal *812Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the district court’s inherent powers. We must decide whether the district court’s order is immediately appealable.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gugliuzza v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Harrison Orr v. PlumbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Naomi Isaacson v. Nauni Jo MantyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Isaacson v. Manty (In re Yehud-Monosson USA, Inc.)District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Nett v. Manty (In re Yehud-Monosson USA, Inc.)District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.