Legal Opinion

Weems v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 9, 1938No. 8 Div. 845PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

Before the amendment of § 2846 of the Code of 1907, by the Act of September 22, 1915 (Acts 1915, p. 722, § 1), a motion for new trial in criminal prosecutions was addressed to the trial court’s discretion, and was not reviewable on appeal. Suttles v. State, 15 Ala.App. 582, 74 So. 400; Burrage v. State, 113 Ala. 108, 21 So. 213; Cooper v. State, 88 Ala. 107, 7 So. 47; Smith v. State, 165 Ala. 50, 58, 51 So. 610, 611.

The statute as amended by said act was first applied on appeal in a criminal case, in Britton v. State, 15 Ala.App. 584, 74 So. 721, decided on March 23, 1917, by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Arant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Peterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Spooney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Stover v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Britton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  2. Orr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Hamm v. WindhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API