Weems v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
Before the amendment of § 2846 of the Code of 1907, by the Act of September 22, 1915 (Acts 1915, p. 722, § 1), a motion for new trial in criminal prosecutions was addressed to the trial court’s discretion, and was not reviewable on appeal. Suttles v. State, 15 Ala.App. 582, 74 So. 400; Burrage v. State, 113 Ala. 108, 21 So. 213; Cooper v. State, 88 Ala. 107, 7 So. 47; Smith v. State, 165 Ala. 50, 58, 51 So. 610, 611.
The statute as amended by said act was first applied on appeal in a criminal case, in Britton v. State, 15 Ala.App. 584, 74 So. 721, decided on March 23, 1917, by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Arant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Peterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Spooney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Stover v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Britton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Orr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Hamm v. WindhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.