Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Metropolitan Baptist Church
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HOYT, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the complaint filed by the plaintiff, Aetna Casualty add Surety Co. (“Aetna”), seeking a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured, Metropolitan Baptist Church (“Metropolitan”), in an underlying lawsuit pending in state district Court. Metropolitan filed a counter complaint against Aetna seeking a declaratory judgment that Aetna has a duty to defend and indemnify it in the underlying action. Metropolitan also filed a third party complaint against Frontier Insurance Company of New York…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Federal Land Bank Ass'n of Tyler v. SloaneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, New Jersey v. BurchTexas Supreme Court · 1968
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. RobnikSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Mt. Hawley Insurance v. Steve Roberts Custom Builders, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002
- McClellan v. FeitNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Federal Insurance v. Ace Property & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Coregis Insurance v. LyfordDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.