Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Metropolitan Baptist Church

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided December 16, 1996No. Civil Action H-96-0959PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HOYT, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is the complaint filed by the plaintiff, Aetna Casualty add Surety Co. (“Aetna”), seeking a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured, Metropolitan Baptist Church (“Metropolitan”), in an underlying lawsuit pending in state district Court. Metropolitan filed a counter complaint against Aetna seeking a declaratory judgment that Aetna has a duty to defend and indemnify it in the underlying action. Metropolitan also filed a third party complaint against Frontier Insurance Company of New York…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Federal Land Bank Ass'n of Tyler v. SloaneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  5. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, New Jersey v. BurchTexas Supreme Court · 1968

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. RobnikSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Mt. Hawley Insurance v. Steve Roberts Custom Builders, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002
  3. McClellan v. FeitNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  4. Federal Insurance v. Ace Property & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  5. Coregis Insurance v. LyfordDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API