Merwin v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS H. NEWTON, Judge.
Dr. John D. Merwin, II, M.D., appeals the decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC) finding that there was sufficient evidence for the State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (Board) to discipline his license under section 334.100. Dr. Merwin claims that the AHC’s decision to discipline his license was not supported by competent and substantial evidence. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Factual and Procedural Background
In 2009, Dr. Merwin was an anesthesiologist at South County Anesthesiology Associates; he was also a co-owner of the medical…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Albanna v. State Board of Registration for the Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Lane v. LensmeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- Tendai v. Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- Gaddy v. State Board of Registration for the Healing ArtsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. TruebloodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Surendra Chaganti v. Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing ArtsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015