Legal Opinion
Claim of Gormeley v. New York Daily News
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 29, 1968PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerlihy, J.
Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which held that claimant did not have an occupational loss of hearing within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The board further found “ that the rules and criteria prescribed for the measurement and determination of loss of hearing are within the power of the board and are highly salutary and eminently reasonable.”
The appellant on this appeal challenges the constitutionality of article 3-A of the Workmen’s Compensation Law captioned “ Occupational Loss of Hearing ” and the rules formulated by the board…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Matter of Marburg v. ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Methodist Hospital of Brooklyn v. State Insurance FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Reiner-Kaiser Associates v. McConnachieCivil Court of the City of New York · 1979
- Claim of Brogan v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Claim of Dendel v. R. Hoe & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975