Legal Opinion · Dissent

Adimey v. Erie County Industrial Development Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 19, 1996Published

1Dissent

Lawton and Davis, JJ. (dissenting in part).

We respectfully dissent in part. The majority’s holding negates the clear wording of Labor Law § 240 (1), which states that an owner is absolutely liable for damages for injuries arising out of a violation of the statute. In this case, defendant, Erie County Industrial Development Agency (ECIDA) is the title owner of the property. If an exception is to be made for “pass-through” owners like defendant, then such a change must be made by the Legislature. ECIDA, as a public entity that owns the land, accepts the advantages and disadvantages associated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spring Sheet Metal & Roofing Co. v. County of Monroe Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API