Go v. Rockefeller University
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PITMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:
I. Introduction
Plaintiff moves for an Order, pursuant to Rule 37(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, compelling (a) production of additional documents in response to her document requests, and (b) revised responses to her requests for admissions (Plaintiffs Response to Order Filed October 28, 2010, dated Nov. 19, 2010 (“Plaintiffs Response to Order”) (Docket Item 1291) at 11-13). For *169the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion is granted in part and denied in part.
II. Facts
A. Background
Plaintiff, Rosita Go, proceeding pro…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Dtd. January 4, 1984. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sulaymu-Bey v. City of N.Y.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Ako Burrell v. Tia Van Winkler, N. Pezdek, D. Traglia, LaPorte, D. Bektic and PelligrinoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2026
- Cameron v. MenardDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2021
- Dimps v. Taconic Correctional FacilityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Elavon, Inc. v. Northeast Advance Technologies Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.