Legal Opinion
Sulaymu-Bey v. City of N.Y.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 8, 2019No. 17-CV-3563-AMD-SJBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BULSARA, United States Magistrate Judge:
Pro se Plaintiffs have filed a motion to compel seeking the production of communications between counsel for ACS and one or more individual Defendants. As the motion itself suggests these are communications between an attorney and his or her clients; such communications typically are privileged and not discoverable. See United States v. Ghavami , 882 F.Supp.2d 532, 536 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) ("The attorney-client privilege protects from disclosure '(1) a communication between client and counsel that (2) was intended to be and was in fact kept confidential, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Dtd. January 4, 1984. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- In Re Richard Roe, Inc., and John Doe, Inc. United States of America v. Richard Roe, Inc., Richard Roe, John Doe, Inc., and John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Burns v. Imagine Films Entertainment, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1996
- Export-Import Bank of the United States v. Asia Pulp & Paper Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kevin King, et al. v. Habib Bank LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- WCA Holdings III, LLC v. Panasonic Avionics CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025