Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Jacinto-Leiva

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 30, 2017No. D142203T; A159343Published

1ConcurrenceDehoog, P. J.

In this case, the majority holds that the trial court did not err in striking defendant’s motion to suppress on the grounds that it failed to cite the authority on which it was based, and that it therefore did not meet the requirements of Uniform Trial Court Rule (UTCR) 4.060(l)(a). I agree that defendant’s motion failed to satisfy UTCR 4.060(l)(a), and that the trial court, therefore, did not err in striking it.

*579I write separately only to make one observation. In this case, not only did defendant’s motion fail to satisfy the requirement, under UTCR 4.060(l)(a), that he cite the authority on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API