Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Action Against McFarland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 15, 2002No. C5-02-553PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Dylan J. McFarland has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, that respondent misappropriated fees that properly belonged to his law firm in violation of Rule 8.4(e), Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC).

Respondent admits his conduct violated the MRPC, waives his rights pursuant to Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against McFarlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against HardwickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Ana L. Pena, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0386459Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API