In re Disciplinary Action Against Hardwick
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentLillehaug, Justice
Because attorney Brian T. Hardwick’s conduct warrants a suspension that is not stayed, I respectfully dissent.
Upon stipulation, the North Dakota Supreme Court suspended Hardwick from the practice of law in North Dakota for 60 days, but stayed the suspension. In re Hardwick, 841 N.W.2d 427, 429-80 (N.D.2013). Now Hardwick and the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility join in recommending that this court impose reciprocal discipline, including the identical stayed suspension.
In the stipulation before us, Hardwick admits unconditionally that he violated Minn. R. Prof.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. HardwickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Disciplinary Action Against McFarlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re EskolaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.