Gurman v. Stowe-Woodward, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in this action of contract to recover damages for breach of an alleged contract of employment. The writ describes the defendant as a corporation. The defendant’s exceptions are to the denial of its motion for a directed verdict; to the refusal of the trial judge to instruct the jury that, “5. The burden is on the plaintiff to show not only that the contract alleged was within the corporate powers of the defendant, but also that it was either made or ratified by an officer or officers having authority to bind the corporation. 6. The president or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Graustein v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Capano v. MelchionnoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Fanciullo v. B. G. & S. Theatre Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Silver v. CushnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Marcelle, Inc. v. Sol. & S. Marcus Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Donnelly v. LarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Malone v. BianchiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Mitchell v. Walton Lunch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Shurdut v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Bank of Boston v. HauflerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.