Legal Opinion
Marcelle, Inc. v. Sol. & S. Marcus Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 24, 1931PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is a suit under St. 1929, c. 186, for a decree interpreting a written “Agreement and Lease” be*471tween the parties. The defendant filed a cross bill. At the trial in the Superior Court and at the argument in this court, no questions were raised by either party relative to pleadings, to procedure under said c. 186, or to the right of the court to determine the issues raised. The case is considered on the footing presented by the parties and no other questions have been regarded.
The trial judge made findings of fact in writing. Thus it appears that there are three matters in controversy. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Eustace v. DickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Pittsfield & North Adams Railroad v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Brown v. Little, Brown & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Lindsey v. BirdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Mark v. Stuart-Howland Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- School Committee of Cambridge v. Superintendent of SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Attorney General v. Trustees of Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- MacDonald v. GoughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Radio Corp. of America v. Raytheon Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Squantum Gardens, Inc. v. Assessors of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.