Sorola v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANTU, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for capital murder. The punishment was assessed at life imprisonment.
At the outset we are confronted with reversible error presented to us in appellant’s first ground of error. This first ground of error asserts that it was reversible error for the trial court to assess punishment following the jury’s verdict of guilty. We agree and reverse.
The record reflects that following the jury’s decision that appellant was guilty of capital murder, the jury was sent back to the jury room. Outside the presence of the jury, the trial court, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Myre v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Eads v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Batten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ex Parte Sorola v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Sorola v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Sorola v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
- Ernest Morales v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Ex Parte Sorola v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.