Sorola v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
DIAL, Justice.
This is an appeal from the denial of the relief requested based upon a double jeop ardy claim urged in appellant’s pretrial writ of habeas corpus.
Appellant was originally found guilty by a jury of the offense of capital murder. Following the jury verdict, and outside the presence of the jury, the trial court, the State, and appellant agreed that because the State had waived the death penalty, the proper procedure was to have the court assess punishment. The trial court sentenced appellant to life imprisonment. On direct appeal this court reversed noting that the Court of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Sewell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ex Parte Sorola v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- David Sidney Hisey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Ex Parte Sorola v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Ex Parte Sorola v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989