Legal Opinion
Melissa Landrum v. T.C. Goddard D/B/A Goddard Auto Sales
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 11, 1991No. 90-1487PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUHÉ, Circuit Judge.
In an issue of first impression for this court, the appellant Goddard challenges the district court’s jury instruction on the burden of proof required in an odometer tampering case. Finding no error, we affirm.
Facts and District Court Proceedings
CFR Leasing Corporation sold a Buick automobile bearing a Georgia certificate of title to Golden Auto Sales, a Mississippi entity. At the time of this transaction, the odometer read 71,534 miles. Golden trans ferred the car to Ransel’s Auto Sales pursuant to an assignment noted on the back of the title certificate. The odometer…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Steadman v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Jenny Nieto, A/K/A Jenny Nieto Soto v. Bill Pence, Individually and D/B/A Import Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Rohner, Gehrig & Company v. Capital City BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Regency Nissan, Inc. v. JenkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Shaghoian v. AghajaniDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Bank One, Texas, N.A. And Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Mbank Houston, N.A., Plaintiffs-Third Party v. Suzan E. Taylor D/B/A Exploration Services, Defendant-Third Party v. Worth Operating, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Heward v. ThahabDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.