Legal Opinion
Hirsch v. Bruchhausen
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 29, 1960No. 26597PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
The petitioners herein seek a writ of mandamus to compel Judge Bruchhausen to vacate an order substituting them as the parties defendant in an action pending before him in the Eastern District of New York. The petition was filed a few days after we had dismissed a direct appeal from the order for lack of a final judgment. Involved also is an unappealable1 order of remand of the action to the state court from which it had originally been removed, since the substitution of parties destroyed diversity of citizenship. Defendants, relying on a claim that the district court has…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Adam v. SaengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Torres v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Adams v. Beland Realty CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Kloeb v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Plum Tree, Inc. v. StockmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Mitchell v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Plum Tree, Inc. v. StockmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- The Travelers Insurance Company v. Mrs. Ada Z. Brown, Individually, and as Natural Tutrix of Ambrose Floyd Brown, Jr., Thomas Harry Brown, Sandra Laverne Brown and Vickie Helen Brown v. John W. Scott v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.