Legal Opinion
Kloeb v. Armour & Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 9, 1940No. 65PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
Respondents, Armour & Company, .a Kentucky corporation, by petition obtained from the Circuit Court of Appeals,. Sixth Circuit, an order directing the U. S. District Judge, Northern District of Ohio, to set aside the remands of five separate actions.. 109 F. 2d 72. The opinion of the court made the following statement concerning the basic issue, j
“A number of. persons, including George E. Kniess, brought suit ag’ainst Armour and Company in the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County for damages claimed to have been suffered in the consumption' of food products, materials for which were prepared…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Ward Trucking Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Appalachian Volunteers, Inc. v. Charles Clark, Edward Lee Blankenship v. Clarles ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.