Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 2021No. 21AP-48PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Smith,

2021-Ohio-4091.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 21AP-48 (C.P.C. No. 19CR-1778) v. : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Michael J. Smith, III, : Defendant-Appellant. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on November 18, 2021 On brief: G. Gary Tyack, Prosecuting Attorney, and Mark R. Wilson, for appellee. Argued: Mark R. Wilson. On brief: The Stavroff Law Firm, and Jeffrey T. Stavroff, for appellant. Argued: Jeffrey T. Stavroff. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas SADLER, J. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Michael J.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. FugateOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. TenchOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. MaddoxOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. Smith, 08ap-736 (5-5-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CherryOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. State v. FavoursOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API