Legal Opinion

State v. Fugate

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2008No. 2006-2289PublishedCited by 184 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} This case presents us with the question whether a defendant who is sentenced concurrently on multiple charges is entitled to have “jail-time credit” 1 applied toward all terms. We hold that defendants who are sentenced to concurrent prison terms are entitled to have jail-time credit applied toward all prison terms for charges on which they were held.

Facts

{¶ 2} Appellant, Daniel J. Fugate, was indicted in case No. 05CR-4367 on one count of burglary, a second-degree felony, and one count of theft, a fifth-degree felony. A jury later found him guilty of theft as charged in the indictment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. White v. GilliganDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1972
  5. Workman v. CardwellDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by184 opinions

  1. State v. Moore (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. MaddoxOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. Ford, 07ap-803 (8-28-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. GuiterresOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. WaysOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API