Ware v. Ware & Harper
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action on contract; from Talbot superior court—Judge Munro. December 23, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.
1. Service of a bill of exceptions upon counsel of record in the case binds all parties represented in the trial court by the counsel served. Acts of 1911, p. 149; § 6164 Park’s Ann. Code. Redman v. Hitchins, 113 Ga. 380 (38 S. E. 819). The assignments of error in the bill of exceptions in this case are sufficient.
2. The defendant admitted the execution of the contract which is the basis of this suit, and filed a plea of fraud in its procurement. The defendant could read and write, and there was no trick, artifice, or fraud practiced upon him which prevented him from reading the contract. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Redman v. HitchinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- Edwards v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Slappy v. Georgia Power CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Hulsey v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Pfeffer v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Hartley v. StrowbridgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.