Legal Opinion

United States v. Garland Spencer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 17, 1988No. 87-1218PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

Spencer, a Native American convicted of murder, raises on appeal two issues of first impression. First, does infliction of injuries on a fetus, who is bom alive but dies as a result of those injuries, constitute murder under 18 U.S.C. § 1111? Second, does the Major Crimes Act, granting federal jurisdiction oyer certain crimes between Native Americans, incorporate this inclusive definition of murder? We hold that fetal infanticide is murder within the meaning of both statutes, and affirm the district court’s order denying Spencer’s motion to dismiss his murder…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. United States v. Jerry R. BohonusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. State v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. State v. DuggarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. State v. CorneliusCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  5. United States v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API