Legal Opinion

Henry v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 22, 1975No. 74-1198PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge:

This is a diversity case in which plaintiff-appellee seeks damages for personal injuries suffered as a result of his mother’s ingestion of thalidomide during pregnancy. In the present appeal, appellant drug company challenges the district court of New Jersey’s application of the New Jersey statute of limitation and consequent denial of its motion for summary judgment. Henry v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 366 F.Supp. 1192 (D.N.J.,1973).1 The district court’s interlocutory order was certified for appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).

Twelve-year old…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. PV Ex Rel. TV v. Camp JayceeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  2. Iwanowa v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  3. Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. Draper v. Airco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. Li Fu v. Hong FuSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API