Legal Opinion

Scheid v. Cavanagh

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1935No. File No. 6283PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Berry, Dist. J.

The appellant brought this action on the 30th day of April, 1932, charging the defendant, a doctor of osteopathy, of Fargo, North Dakota, with malpractice and a fraudulent concealment of the facts constituting negligence, and she asks damages for such negligence.

The defendant in his answer admits that he treated the plaintiff in the month of June, 1928, and alleges that said purported and alleged cause of action set forth in the plaintiff’s complaint occurred more than two years prior to the commencement of the action and hence is barred by the statute of limitations; and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scherer v. SchlabergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Duncan v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State Bank v. Bismarck Elevator & Investment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Johnston's Fuel Liners, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Lovas v. St. Paul Insurance CompaniesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Stokes v. DaileyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Westland Oil Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  5. Dick v. LewisDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API