Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Martin Andersen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 19, 1971No. 26659PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELY, Circuit Judge:

Andersen was convicted for having failed to submit to induction into the armed forces. 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. We have concluded that the local board had no basis in fact for denying Andersen’s timely claim for exemption as a conscientious objector; hence, the judgment of conviction must be reversed.

Andersen had received both student [II — SU and occupational [II-A] deferments from his local board, the latter for a computer programming course he completed in March, 1969, On March 7, 1969, and on April 2, 1969, Andersen submitted completed applications for a conscientious…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. United States v. Lonnie Leroy HaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. James Seth StewartCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Carl J. Christensen v. Reginald A. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. Bradley Robert WillsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. Koh v. Secretary of Air ForceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982
  5. United States v. Eric Marshall NaglerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API