Legal Opinion

United States v. Harold Smith Chancey

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 29, 1982No. 81-7618PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Harold Smith Chancey appeals from the district court’s order extending his term of probation from July 12, 1981, until July 12, 1982, Chancey makes two contentions on appeal. First, he argues that the district court lacked jurisdiction to extend his probation because his original term of probation had expired when his probation officer petitioned the court for extension. Second, he argues that assuming the court had jurisdiction, the facts brought out at the hearing did not warrant extension. We find both of these contentions without merit and affirm the district court’s order extending…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ronald Skipworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. SquillanteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  3. Martin v. LutherDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cronn v. BuffingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. FlynnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. James Earl McCraeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Charles OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Steven Robert EinspahrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API