Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles Ortiz

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 15, 1984No. 83-2564PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

On July 15, 1981, defendant was charged by information with the crime of offering to sell and selling parts of the bodies of golden eagles in violation of 16 U.S.C. § 668(a). Defendant consented to proceeding before a federal magistrate and entered a plea of guilty to the offense. Defendant was sentenced to supervised probation for two years…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Ronald Skipworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Hugo Eduardo Briones-Garza A/K/A Juan Ramirez-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. RobinsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. People v. CooksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Collins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darnell PARKS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Reid v. PautlerDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API