Legal Opinion

Bart v. Conforto

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1947No. 18669PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Oscar Bart, a contractor, alleges that defendant is indebted to him in the sum of $300 as the amount due for the performance of a written contract to install certain tiles on the walls and sink of his kitchen. He prays for personal judgment against Conforto and for recognition of his lien upon the property, No. 2522-24 Ursuline Avenue in New Orleans, belonging to the said Conforto.

Defendant filed a plea of prematurity based on the alleged fact "that the plaintiff has not completed and has refused to complete the work entered into with defendant." At the same time defendant also filed an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Antoine v. FranichevichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. Hicks v. TateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Markel v. C.W.M. Const. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fleming Asphalt Co. v. Red Stick Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API