Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Tate

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1942No. 2374PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These two cases were consolidated for trial in the lower court and were also consolidated for argument and submission in this court. The same issues are involved in both.

The plaintiff in one of the suits, Norman F. Hicks, was a sub-contractor of Henning-Miller Lumber Co., Inc., which had entered into a verbal contract with the defendant, Richard C. Tate, to erect a dwelling on a lot of ground in Margaret Place Addition to the city of Lake Charles. The contract which was agreed on sometime prior to October 1, 1932, was for $6,700, and being verbal, obviously it could not be and never was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hortman-Salmen Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hattiesburg Manufacturing Co. v. PepeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Cain v. Central Plumbing and Heating CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Electric Contracting Co. v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Martinez v. THERMA-KING SALES & SERV. DIV. OF TRAS.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. WM Bailey & Sons v. Western Geophysical Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API