United States v. Richard Clark, III
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOKEN, Circuit Judge.
Richard Clark appeals his conviction for carjacking and for using a firearm while committing a crime of violence. He argues that the district court 1 erred in instructing the jury that it could draw three permissive inferences from the evidence, and in departing upward because of Clark’s extreme conduct. We affirm.
I. The Jury Instruction Issues
On the night of June 27, 1993, two armed carj ackers wearing bandannas over their faces ordered Warren Roehl out of the driver’s seat and into the back seat of his car, which was stopped at a Minneapolis intersection. One assailant,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Sean Hart, Neil White, Joseph Orlando, Lawrence WeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Steven Triplett, United States of America v. Joseph Lee TriplettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Richard D. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.