Legal Opinion

Frederick F. Petersen, Deceased, and Mary Jane Petersen, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Frederick F. Petersen, Cross-Appellants v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, Cross-Appellee, and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Third-Party v. Armstrong Cork Company, the Celotex Corporation, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Owens-Illinois Glass Company, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., and Garlock, Inc., Third- Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 21, 1986No. 84-1557PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

784 F.2d 732

1987 A.M.C. 769

Frederick F. PETERSEN, deceased, and Mary Jane Petersen,

individually and as Administratrix of the Estate

of Frederick F. Petersen,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants,

v.

The CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,

and

JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION, Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, the Celotex Corporation,

Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation,

Owens-Illinois Glass Company,

Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.,

and Garlock, Inc.,

Third-

Party Defendants.

Nos. 84-1557, 84-1598.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Oct.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Foremost Insurance v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Byron Gizoni v. Southwest Marine, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Petty v. Dakota Barge ServiceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API