Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Kelly
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 21, 2002No. CIV. A. 99-30139-MAPPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON THE PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Docket No. 74)
PONSOR, District Judge.
David and Patricia Schultz have brought this civil rights action against the members of the Board of Selectmen of the Town of Brimfield regarding a by-law that purports to regulate flea market activity within the Town. Following discovery, both sides filed motions for summary judgment. These motions were referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman for Report and Recommendation.
On January 24, 2002, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Walsh v. Town of LakevilleDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- O'Rourke v. Hampshire Council of GovernmentsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Melville v. Town of AdamsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- AGA SHAREHOLDERS, LLC v. CSK Auto, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2008
- Terumo Americas Holding, Inc. v. TureskiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.