Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Sperling

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 15, 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Louis D. Laurino, J.

Kurt Storch, the executor appointed under the decedent’s will, asks the court to construe the instrument and, more particularly, the first paragraph to determine what is to be charged to the legacy he receives under it. The paragraph in question reads: "First, after my lawful debts are paid, I give and bequeath to hurt storch the sum of $10,000.00, out of which sum I direct that he pay my funeral expenses and other lawfull [sic] debts and in addition pay for the perpetual care of my grave and that of my late husband morris sperling, both *447graves being…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patterson v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Graves v. . DeterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. In re the Estate of SchoenfelderNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  4. In re the Estate of ParantNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
  5. In re the Estate of TurnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SchiederNew York Surrogate's Court · 1981
  2. Silver v. SchroederDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API