Legal Opinion
United States v. Marcela Flores, United States of America v. Felipe Gonzalez-Esparza
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 14, 1976No. 75-3439, 75-3440PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
These cases have been consolidated for purposes of appeal. Both appellants appeal from their convictions in the Central District of California for the following offenses: one count of conspiracy to possess and distribute a narcotic drug (21 U.S.C. § 846); two counts of possession with intent to distribute heroin (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(17)); and two counts of distribution of heroin (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(11)). Appellants were convicted pursuant to a court trial.
Several motions were filed by appellants during the course of the proceedings in the trial court, including (1) a motion to suppress…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Geduldig v. AielloSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by39 opinions
- People v. BaynesIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- United States v. Miriam Henao Posado, Pablo Ramirez and Irma Clemencia HurtadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Graham Lee KendallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Dwight ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Robert L. Beecroft, Arthur T. Harrison, James F. Hennig, and Delbert L. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.