Legal Opinion

Pitsenbarger v. Gainer

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1985No. 16223PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGRAW, Justice:

Petitioners James E. Pitsenbarger and Ronald R. Potesta, as Director of the Department of Natural Resources, seek a writ of mandamus compelling payment by respondent State Auditor Glen B. Gainer, Jr., of legal fees and expenses incurred in Pitsenbarger’s successful defense of a felony charge alleging embezzlement of state property in connection with his employment with the Department. This attempt follows the rejection of Pitsenbarger's similar effort seeking indemnification from the Randolph County Commission or Prosecuting Attorney by the trial judge, who determined that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Conley v. SpillersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Powers v. GoodwinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Martin v. MullinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Goe v. BrowningWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Mellon-Stuart Co. v. HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Vest v. Bd. of Educ. of Cty. of NicholasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Asaad v. Res-Care, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Walden v. HokeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API