Goe v. Browning
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEELY, Justice:
In this mandamus action the petitioner, Norval D. Goe, executor of the estate of William Robert Goe, seeks to compel the respondent, the Attorney General of the State of West Virginia, to represent William Goe’s estate in a civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons set forth below, we believe the Attorney General has a clear legal duty to represent the estate and, therefore, we award the writ.
On 30 July 1980, Byron D. Dennison filed a civil rights suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Powers v. GoodwinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Martin v. MullinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pitsenbarger v. GainerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- Estate of Goe v. Attorney GeneralWest Virginia Court of Claims · 1984