Legal Opinion

Schwed v. Parks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 23, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It appears that upon the argument of the motion the retiring or discharged attorney requested a lien for a percentage fee to be fixed by the Special Term immediately without awaiting the outcome of the action, and asked that he be immediately reimbursed for his disbursements. The percentage fee of a retiring or discharged attorney is normally fixed after the recovery. However, when at his request it is fixed at the time of substitution, his subsequent objection upon the ground that the determination was premature will be disregarded. It is customary in negligence cases for disbursements to be…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Steves v. SerlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Pudalov v. BroganNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Dreyer v. DondorfNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Reilly v. Millcount Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Rizzi v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API