Cathleen Robertson, V. Valley Communications Center
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CATHLEEN ROBERTSON, SCOTT CASTONGUAY and ANDREA RAKER, No. 80861-3-I for themselves, and for all others similarly situated, DIVISION ONE Appellants, PUBLISHED OPINION v. VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER, Respondent. APPELWICK, J. — Employees of the VCC brought suit under the Washington Minimum Wage Act1 alleging the VCC regularly required them to perform nine tasks prior to the start of their shift without pay. The trial court granted summary judgment that six of these nine tasks were not compensable work tasks or were otherwise de minimis. The…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Keith v. VolpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Ted L. Lindow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Fortune Dynamic, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.